IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-20 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 58 10 27 37 0.638 0.1086 0.1220 0.2703 0.3036
2024-25 Collingwood Blues OJHL 50 8 33 41 0.820 0.2010 0.2150 0.5644 0.6038
2025-26 Sudbury Wolves OHL 62 1 14 15 0.242 0.1399 0.1406 0.6334 0.6365
2026-27 Sudbury Wolves OHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8553
Defenseman overall
#1218
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tim Theocharidis
CCHL 2016-17
0.32
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Ben Wozney
BCHL 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Jacob Dalton
NAHL 2015-16
0.14
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Justin Wells
USHL 2016-17
0.14
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Orrin Hergott
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Laganiere
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2005-06
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.