IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrik Ula Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-11-28 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 29 5 15 20 0.690 0.2534 0.2973 1.3092 1.4755
2026-27 Sudbury Wolves OHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.2314 0.2314 1.0474 1.0474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18659
Forward overall
#84
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Shane Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Max Strand
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Blake Steenerson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Thomas Sinclair
OJHL 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Michael La Starza
USHL 2020-21
0.28
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Merrell
University of New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Aiello
UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2012-13
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.