IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrik Ula Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-11-28 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 29 5 15 20 0.690 0.2534 0.2973 1.2848 1.4480
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18289
Forward overall
#60
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Kyle Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Michigan (1.87 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wahlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gambrell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (1.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Anders Bjork
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Larkin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Max Strand
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Blake Steenerson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Bryce Misley
OJHL 2015-16
0.17
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Joel Määttä
SM-Liiga-Jr 2018-19
0.19
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Caron
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.