IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Ashcroft Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-01 Country: Canada
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Soo Greyhounds OHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0723 0.0752 0.3212 0.3340
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Hudson Miller
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.13
actual FR PPG at Yale
Dylan Hunt
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale
Bayard Hall
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale
Jason Marsella
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Sanders
Elmira · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Barry
Nichols · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.