IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Ashcroft Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-01 Country: Canada
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Soo Greyhounds OHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0723 0.0752 0.3273 0.3403
2026-27 Soo Greyhounds OHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0964 0.0964 0.4365 0.4365
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jason Marsella
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Yale
Dylan Hunt
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale
Chandler Lindstrand
USHL 2014-15
0.29
actual FR PPG at Yale
Bayard Hall
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack DesRuisseaux
Wesleyan · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.