IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tiernan O’Rourke

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 29 2 4 6 0.207 0.0410 0.0410 0.0943 0.0943
2022-23 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 23 2 2 4 0.174 0.0344 0.0344 0.0792 0.0792
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25404
Defenseman overall
#1629
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Stenberg
0.19
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Dustin Laren
0.10
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Cole Watson
0.09
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Saxen Robertson
0.00
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Klas
Salem State · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Butcher
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Forsyth
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.