IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack O’Connor

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Colby
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 St. Marks NE-Prep 28 0 1 1 0.036 0.0071 0.0071 0.0163 0.0163
2023-24 St. Marks NE-Prep 28 1 5 6 0.214 0.0425 0.0425 0.0976 0.0976
2024-25 St. Marks NE-Prep 29 2 9 11 0.379 0.0751 0.0751 0.1728 0.1728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22004
Defenseman overall
#1364
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Colby Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Eric Simmons
0.30
actual FR PPG at Colby
Henry Molson
0.33
actual FR PPG at Colby
Luke Swaim
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colby
James Tepper
0.17
actual FR PPG at Colby

D2/3 Comparables

Nicolas Guerra
Concordia · 2014-15
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Egor Borshchev
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Thompson
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.