← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Swanson

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Eveleth-Gilbert USHS-MN 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 19 0 4 4 0.210 0.0266 0.0266 0.0511 0.0511
2022-23 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 2 17 19 0.613 0.0776 0.0776 0.1488 0.1488
2023-24 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 29 4 9 13 0.448 0.0568 0.0568 0.1088 0.1088
2024-25 Hibbing/Chisholm USHS-MN 28 20 34 54 1.929 0.2442 0.2442 0.4683 0.4683
2025-26 Hibbing/Chisholm USHS-MN 29 29 34 63 2.172 0.2750 0.2750 0.5275 0.5275
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7078
Forward overall
#129
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2016-17
0.11
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
OJHL 2018-19
0.46
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
NAHL 2015-16
0.52
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2000-01
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2011-12
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.