← New Search ↗ Social Card

Boden Sampair

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 30 8 8 16 0.533 0.0675 0.0675 0.1295 0.1295
2023-24 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 28 21 20 41 1.464 0.1854 0.1854 0.3557 0.3557
2024-25 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 28 35 37 72 2.571 0.3255 0.3255 0.6246 0.6246
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6510
Forward overall
#112
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.15
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.18
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2003-04
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.