IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Mikan

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 28 19 33 52 1.857 0.2351 0.2351 0.4509 0.4509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5878
Forward overall
#87
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Eli Friedman
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Yale
Donovan Frias
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.40
actual FR PPG at Yale
Kurt Gurkan
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.25
actual FR PPG at Yale
James Shannon
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.37
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Caouette
New England College · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lee
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.