← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Wong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-04 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Saskatchewan · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kelowna Rockets WHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.1216 0.1398 0.6134 0.7052
2019-20 Kelowna Rockets WHL 58 6 8 14 0.241 0.1174 0.1174 0.5923 0.5923
2020-21 Kelowna Rockets WHL 16 6 10 16 1.000 0.4865 0.4865 2.4537 2.4537
2021-22 Saskatoon Blades WHL 50 17 25 42 0.840 0.4087 0.4065 2.0611 2.0498
2022-23 Saskatoon Blades WHL 68 27 59 86 1.265 0.6153 0.5832 3.1032 2.9414
2023-24 Saskatoon Blades WHL 68 15 86 101 1.485 0.7226 0.6493 3.6445 3.2748
2024-25 Univ. of Saskatchewan USports-M 28 2 19 21 0.750 0.3957 0.4259 2.1982 2.3658
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 34 5 15 20 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
+22.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4658
Forward overall
#133
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.