← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Wong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kelowna Rockets WHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.1216 0.1398 0.6102 0.7015
2019-20 Kelowna Rockets WHL 58 6 8 14 0.241 0.1174 0.1174 0.5892 0.5892
2020-21 Kelowna Rockets WHL 16 6 10 16 1.000 0.4862 0.4862 2.4408 2.4408
2021-22 Saskatoon Blades WHL 50 17 25 42 0.840 0.4084 0.4062 2.0503 2.0391
2022-23 Saskatoon Blades WHL 68 27 59 86 1.265 0.6149 0.5828 3.0869 2.9260
2023-24 Saskatoon Blades WHL 68 15 86 101 1.485 0.7222 0.6489 3.6253 3.2576
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 34 5 15 20 0.588
2025-26 Omaha D1 NCHC 34 5 15 20 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
+1.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1169
Forward overall
#27
Forward born in 2003
#54
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.