← New Search ↗ Social Card

Talon Brigley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-16 Country: Canada
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Red Deer Rebels WHL 60 8 6 14 0.233 0.1135 0.1230 0.5724 0.6205
2022-23 Red Deer Rebels WHL 68 5 10 15 0.221 0.1073 0.1113 0.5413 0.5615
2023-24 Red Deer Rebels WHL 66 20 14 34 0.515 0.2506 0.2476 1.2641 1.2491
2024-25 Red Deer Rebels WHL 68 9 19 28 0.412 0.2003 0.1872 1.0104 0.9444
2025-26 Red Deer Rebels WHL 67 20 18 38 0.567 0.2759 0.2451 1.3917 1.2364
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21935
Forward overall
#1210
Forward born in 2005
#789
in WHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.69
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
OJHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.