← New Search ↗ Social Card

Briggs Orr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-28 Country: USA
Ferris State
Verbal CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Calgary Hitmen WHL 17 1 4 5 0.294 0.1431 0.1559 0.7184 0.7827
2022-23 — NAHL 37 0 3 3 0.081 0.0298 0.0325 0.0857 0.0933
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0283 0.0295 0.0813 0.0847
2024-25 — NAHL 56 4 6 10 0.179 0.0656 0.0649 0.1888 0.1867
2025-26 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 43 1 14 15 0.349 0.1281 0.1204 0.3686 0.3463
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18433
Defenseman overall
#3270
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Ferris State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2018-19
0.05
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
NAHL 2016-17
0.23
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.12
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
NAHL 2019-20
0.10
actual FR PPG at Ferris State

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2023-24
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.