← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niko Tsakumis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-05 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0884 0.0975 0.4461 0.4921
2022-23 WHL 40 2 5 7 0.175 0.0851 0.0899 0.4294 0.4536
2023-24 Everett Silvertips WHL 50 2 13 15 0.300 0.1459 0.1469 0.7361 0.7413
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 56 1 12 13 0.232 0.1129 0.1077 0.5695 0.5431
2025-26 Portland Winterhawks WHL 40 0 9 9 0.225 0.1095 0.0994 0.5521 0.5010
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14378
Defenseman overall
#2776
Defenseman born in 2005
#1353
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2023-24
0.12
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.52
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
AJHL 2021-22
0.37
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
BCHL 2012-13
0.27
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2008-09
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.