← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Oiring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-09 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild WHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 WHL 57 12 19 31 0.544 0.2646 0.2775 1.3346 1.3995
2023-24 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 68 21 29 50 0.735 0.3577 0.3575 1.8042 1.8030
2024-25 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 68 29 56 85 1.250 0.6081 0.5752 3.0671 2.9012
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 68 28 41 69 1.015 0.4937 0.4441 2.4898 2.2399
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5798
Forward overall
#174
Forward born in 2005
#152
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL 2025-26
0.59
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
BCHL 2016-17
0.33
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
BCHL 2018-19
0.50
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2015-16
0.40
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.