← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Neutens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-03 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Canmore Eagles AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Kelowna Rockets WHL 62 1 8 9 0.145 0.0706 0.0740 0.3563 0.3733
2023-24 Kelowna Rockets WHL 61 9 5 14 0.230 0.1117 0.1115 0.5631 0.5623
2024-25 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 59 5 7 12 0.203 0.0990 0.0936 0.4991 0.4717
2025-26 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 53 12 12 24 0.453 0.2203 0.1980 1.1110 0.9986
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35556
Forward overall
#2188
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.28
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2012-13
0.30
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2015-16
0.36
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
BCHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.