IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Bloomer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-10 Country: USA
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Houston Bulls NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 — SJHL 27 5 9 14 0.518 0.1328 0.1375 0.3908 0.4046
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 61 5 7 12 0.197 0.1160 0.1098 0.5908 0.5592
2025-26 Tri-City Storm USHL 58 8 13 21 0.362 0.2136 0.1919 1.0875 0.9768
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32361
Forward overall
#1931
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Aaron Reierson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.28
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Corey Renwick
BCHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Bradley Duwe
NAHL 2012-13
0.30
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Alex Jackstadt
NAHL 2014-15
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Kroska
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Coyle
Castleton · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.