← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Matthews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-04 Country: Canada
Robert Morris
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Victoria Royals WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Victoria Royals WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Victoria Royals WHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.1297 0.1361 0.6515 0.6837
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 65 15 21 36 0.554 0.2694 0.2702 1.3528 1.3570
2026-27 Victoria Royals WHL 4 1 2 3 0.750 0.3649 0.3649 1.8320 1.8320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27015
Forward overall
#908
Forward born in 2007
#980
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Robert Morris Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2015-16
0.54
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
NAHL 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
CCHL 2016-17
0.30
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
OJHL 2014-15
0.39
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2023-24
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2007-08
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.