← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Matthews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-04 Country: Canada
Robert Morris
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Victoria Royals WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Victoria Royals WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Victoria Royals WHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.1297 0.1361 0.6544 0.6867
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 65 15 21 36 0.554 0.2694 0.2702 1.3589 1.3631
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26619
Forward overall
#865
Forward born in 2007
#918
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Robert Morris Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2014-15
0.30
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
NAHL 2021-22
0.24
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
OJHL 2013-14
0.39
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
USHL 2022-23
0.13
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2010-11
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2020-21
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.