← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Gorzynski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-12 Country: USA
2025 · Round 4, Pick #126  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Calgary Hitmen WHL 42 4 5 9 0.214 0.1043 0.1138 0.5235 0.5713
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 68 17 25 42 0.618 0.3005 0.3119 1.5086 1.5658
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 65 27 42 69 1.062 0.5164 0.5121 2.5929 2.5712
2026-27 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0973 0.0973 0.4885 0.4885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12101
Forward overall
#316
Forward born in 2007
#473
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
AJHL 2014-15
0.29
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.