IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Gorzynski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-12 Country: USA
2025 · Round 4, Pick #126  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Calgary Hitmen WHL 42 4 5 9 0.214 0.1043 0.1138 0.5258 0.5738
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 68 17 25 42 0.618 0.3005 0.3119 1.5154 1.5728
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 65 27 42 69 1.062 0.5164 0.5121 2.6046 2.5828
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11893
Forward overall
#294
Forward born in 2007
#446
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Frank Vatrano
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dave Gust
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brett Gruber
BCHL 2014-15
0.44
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
John Waldron
USHL 2021-22
0.38
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Jack Jensen
NAHL 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Matthew Romer
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Sascha Figi
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.