← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Evaschesen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-11 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
RPI
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 34 5 10 15 0.441 0.1700 0.1768 0.6417 0.6674
2025-26 Kamloops Blazers WHL 67 33 40 73 1.090 0.5301 0.5102 2.6616 2.5617
2026-27 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 5 2 3 5 1.000 0.4865 0.4865 2.4427 2.4427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10544
Forward overall
#372
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

RPI Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2024-25
0.17
actual FR PPG at RPI
BCHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at RPI
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at RPI
USHL 2018-19
0.35
actual FR PPG at RPI

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.