← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Maloney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-16 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Calgary Canucks AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Calgary Canucks AJHL 44 13 27 40 0.909 0.3049 0.3172 0.8411 0.8749
2025-26 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 46 4 24 28 0.609 0.2961 0.2864 1.4869 1.4384
2026-27 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1622 0.1622 0.8142 0.8142
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3330
Defenseman overall
#678
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
BCHL 2023-24
0.11
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.