IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lance McCloskey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-09-13 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Vancouver Giants WHL 60 4 3 7 0.117 0.0568 0.0578 0.2863 0.2911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24815
Defenseman overall
#2893
Defenseman born in 2007
#1762
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Liam Chapman
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Army
Jude Brower
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
Mac Gadowsky
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.82
actual FR PPG at Army
Brad Zona
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Miller
Endicott · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor May
Adrian · 2017-18
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.