IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Hajt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-10 Country: USA
Princeton
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Prince George Cougars WHL 40 3 2 5 0.125 0.0608 0.0659 0.3067 0.3323
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#55407
Forward overall
#302
Forward born in 2009
#1735
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Fiegl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Princeton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Drew Garzone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.16
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Seamus Latta
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Princeton
James Fitzpatrick
NE-Prep 2024-25
0.17
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Malcolm Green
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Princeton

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2001-02
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shael Hechter
Gustavus Adolphus · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Currie
Adrian · 2011-12
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.