IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Hajt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-10 Country: USA
Princeton
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Prince George Cougars WHL 40 3 2 5 0.125 0.0608 0.0659 0.3053 0.3307
2026-27 Prince George Cougars WHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0973 0.0973 0.4885 0.4885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#55944
Forward overall
#367
Forward born in 2009
#1796
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Princeton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Seamus Latta
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Malcolm Green
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Jackson Cressey
BCHL 2013-14
0.97
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Brendan Gorman
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.61
actual FR PPG at Princeton

D2/3 Comparables

J.B. Baker
Nichols · 2012-13
1.482 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Peterson
Bethel · 2002-03
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2013-14
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.