← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Collard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-03 Country: Canada
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 65 12 8 20 0.308 0.1512 0.1641 0.8217 0.8916
2022-23 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 68 15 12 27 0.397 0.1951 0.2022 1.0604 1.0987
2023-24 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 66 28 29 57 0.864 0.4243 0.4187 2.3061 2.2756
2024-25 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 64 25 27 52 0.812 0.3992 0.3743 2.1696 2.0343
2025-26 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 62 16 25 41 0.661 0.3249 0.2893 1.7659 1.5723
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10841
Forward overall
#486
Forward born in 2005
#403
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.