IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Legostaev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-02 Country: Canada
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brockville Braves CCHL 13 5 0 5 0.385 0.0834 0.0953 0.2976 0.3400
2024-25 Brockville Braves CCHL 54 19 25 44 0.815 0.1767 0.1939 0.6304 0.6917
2025-26 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 31 8 8 16 0.516 0.2536 0.2606 1.3781 1.4161
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14503
Forward overall
#402
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Gabriel Seger
SuperElit 2017-18
0.59
actual FR PPG at Union
Gleb Murtazin
USHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
Trevor Adams
BCHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
Andrew Seaman
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.22
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Caron
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.