← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Legostaev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-02 Country: Canada
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brockville Braves CCHL 13 5 0 5 0.385 0.0834 0.0953 0.2946 0.3365
2024-25 Brockville Braves CCHL 54 19 25 44 0.815 0.1767 0.1939 0.6241 0.6848
2025-26 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 31 8 8 16 0.516 0.2536 0.2606 1.3778 1.4157
2026-27 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 7 2 3 5 0.714 0.3509 0.3509 1.9069 1.9069
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14769
Forward overall
#432
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.78
actual FR PPG at Union
BCHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
BCHL 2014-15
0.13
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.