← New Search ↗ Social Card

Benjamin Marcolini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-18 Country: USA
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets 14U AAA thf-14u 10 2 1 3 0.300 — — — —
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets 15U AAA thf-15u 11 6 10 16 1.454 — — — —
2024-25 New Jersey Rockets 16U AAA thf-16u 12 2 4 6 0.500 — — — —
2025-26 Cushing Academy ushs-prep 33 11 18 29 0.879 — — — —
2026-27 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 8 2 2 4 0.500 0.1837 0.1932 0.5284 0.5557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
BCHL 2016-17
0.56
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.09
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2007-08
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.