← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Thornborough Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-22 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Governors Academy NE-Prep 23 4 9 13 0.565 0.1120 0.1120 0.2575 0.2575
2024-25 Governors Academy NE-Prep 19 8 11 19 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 0.4556 0.4556
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 41 0 2 2 0.049 0.0240 0.0255 0.1303 0.1386
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38907
Forward overall
#687
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2018-19
0.42
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2016-17
0.24
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2015-16
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2014-15
0.30
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2010-11
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.