← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Thornborough Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-22 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Governors Academy NE-Prep 23 4 9 13 0.565 0.1137 0.1137 0.2585 0.2585
2024-25 Governors Academy NE-Prep 19 8 11 19 1.000 0.2011 0.2011 0.4573 0.4573
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 41 0 2 2 0.049 0.0240 0.0255 0.1303 0.1386
2026-27 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0702 0.0702 0.3815 0.3815
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39420
Forward overall
#772
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2019-20
0.42
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2021-22
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
CCHL 2018-19
0.21
actual FR PPG at Maine
SM-Liiga-Jr 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2016-17
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2016-17
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.