IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Manchuso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-08 Country: USA
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2026-27 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1404 0.1404 0.7627 0.7627
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alex Krause
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Tyler Grahme
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Nikita Nikora
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.80
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Grayden Robertson-Palmer
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Zack Chouinard
Keene State · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Todd
Lebanon Valley · 2003-04
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.