IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Manthey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 53 4 9 13 0.245 0.0972 0.0979 0.2575 0.2595
2004-05 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 50 6 17 23 0.460 0.1823 0.1746 0.4830 0.4626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SR 26 2 12 14 0.538
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 27 4 11 15 0.556
2006-07 Army D1 AHA SO 34 11 18 29 0.853
2005-06 Army D1 AHA FR 36 5 18 23 0.639
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2005-06 · Army
+370.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10909
Defenseman overall
#1150
Defenseman born in 1985
#3870
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Serpico
SUNY Geneseo · 2013-14
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Benshadle
Trinity · 2015-16
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.