IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Sullivan

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 32 0 13 13 0.406 0.0805 0.0805 0.1851 0.1851
2021-22 Rivers School NE-Prep 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0270 0.0270 0.0621 0.0621
2022-23 Rivers School NE-Prep 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0086 0.0086 0.0198 0.0198
2023-24 Rivers School NE-Prep 30 0 3 3 0.100 0.0198 0.0198 0.0456 0.0456
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Westfield State D1 MASCAC FR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2004-05 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 36 2 9 11 0.306
2003-04 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 34 1 3 4 0.118
2002-03 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 27 0 3 3 0.111
2001-02 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 25 1 2 3 0.120

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30389
Defenseman overall
#2216
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Mecrones
Rivier · 2018-19
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Boswell
Nichols · 2022-23
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phillip Middleton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.