← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Shea Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-11 Country: USA
2015 · Round 4, Pick #121  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Babson
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 USHL 28 2 5 7 0.250 0.1475 0.1466 0.7509 0.7465
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 34 5 26 31 0.912
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 39 3 13 16 0.410
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 38 1 16 17 0.447
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 38 1 13 14 0.368
2015-16 Southern New Hampshire D2 HockeyEast FR 20 2 1 3 0.150

NCAAe Rankings

#10440
Defenseman overall
#1723
Defenseman born in 1997
#3266
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.24
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson
1.00
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2003-04
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2019-20
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2002-03
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.