← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Jones

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 9 0 3 3 0.333 0.1118 0.1218 0.3084 0.3359
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Marian D3 NCHA JR 28 2 9 11 0.393
2006-07 Marian D3 NCHA SO 27 4 6 10 0.370
2005-06 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 1 4 5 0.185
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2005-06 · Marian
+61.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
SHL-J20 2017-18
0.30
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.09
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2005-06
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.