← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Wiesner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 15 3 4 7 0.467 0.1733 0.1778 0.4941 0.5068
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Gustavus Adolphus D3 FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23891
Forward overall
#947
Forward born in 1989
#2529
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Bentley (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.20 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Air Force (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's · 2013-14
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.