IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Arm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-07-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Motor City Metal Jackets NAHL 58 3 9 12 0.207 0.0735 0.0733 0.2182 0.2177
2011-12 Jamestown Ironmen NAHL 47 3 7 10 0.213 0.0756 0.0717 0.2245 0.2130
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2014-15 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 27 2 9 11 0.407
2013-14 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 27 3 4 7 0.259
2012-13 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 27 3 7 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2012-13 · Johnson & Wales
+442.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19811
Defenseman overall
#1836
Defenseman born in 1991
#5738
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stephen Collins
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Crowley
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Suvak
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.