IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Farrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1225 0.1312 0.3518 0.3767
2017-18 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 58 3 25 28 0.483 0.1774 0.1812 0.5096 0.5204
2018-19 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 3 7 10 0.172 0.1017 0.0954 0.5178 0.4859
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Army D1 AHA SR 37 6 14 20 0.540
2021-22 Army D1 AHA JR 35 4 14 18 0.514
2020-21 Army D1 AHA SO 22 5 9 14 0.636
2019-20 Army D1 AHA FR 32 1 9 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2019-20 · Army
+155.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11610
Defenseman overall
#2109
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Williams
Norwich · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Sloan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Maisells
New England College · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.