IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 52 12 14 26 0.500 0.1837 0.1837 0.5278 0.5278
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 18 22 40 0.784 0.2882 0.2882 0.8278 0.8278
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 30 50 80 1.403 0.5156 0.4815 1.4814 1.3835
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA SR 34 6 21 27 0.794
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2025-26 · St. Thomas
+92.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9115
Forward overall
#396
Forward born in 2001
#189
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.