IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 52 12 14 26 0.500 0.1981 0.1981 0.5250 0.5250
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 18 22 40 0.784 0.3107 0.3107 0.8234 0.8234
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 30 50 80 1.403 0.5561 0.5194 1.4735 1.3762
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA SR 34 6 21 27 0.794
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2025-26 · St. Thomas
+64.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8959
Forward overall
#369
Forward born in 2001
#185
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Covelli
Colby · 2004-05
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.