← New Search ↗ Social Card

Fletcher Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 13 23 36 0.610 0.1324 0.1403 0.4724 0.5005
2018-19 CCHL 63 16 31 47 0.746 0.1618 0.1642 0.5775 0.5862
2019-20 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 53 31 37 68 1.283 0.2783 0.2783 0.9932 0.9932
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 48 13 18 31 0.646 0.2294 0.2294 0.6780 0.6780
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 22 10 20 30 1.364
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 29 13 17 30 1.034
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 30 14 15 29 0.967
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 22 7 9 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2021-22 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+449.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15571
Forward overall
#657
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.