IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 31 0 4 4 0.129 0.0433 0.0414 0.1194 0.1141
2019-20 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 37 4 14 18 0.486 0.0636 0.0636 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18627
Defenseman overall
#2893
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Springman
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Oller
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Miller
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2005-06
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.