← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gunnar Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Edina USHS-MN 27 0 11 11 0.407 0.0502 0.0502 0.0990 0.0990
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 44 1 3 4 0.091 0.0323 0.0323 0.0954 0.0954
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 0 5 5 0.098 0.0348 0.0336 0.1029 0.0993
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 26 2 13 15 0.577
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 26 2 10 12 0.462
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 27 0 6 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · St. Olaf
+484.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25246
Defenseman overall
#3517
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.