IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bowen Burke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-09 Country: USA
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Colorado Grit NAHL 60 8 20 28 0.467 0.1715 0.1775 0.4926 0.5098
2024-25 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 52 1 17 18 0.346 0.1334 0.1287 0.5038 0.4862
2025-26 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 58 12 25 37 0.638 0.2344 0.2187 0.6733 0.6283
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6848
Defenseman overall
#1657
Defenseman born in 2005
#2472
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cal Mell
NAHL 2021-22
0.44
actual FR PPG at Union
Joseph Messina
BCHL 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Union
Michael Ryan
BCHL 2017-18
0.14
actual FR PPG at Union
Griffyn Martin
BCHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Beaudoin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Nolan
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.