IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Rubin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-03 Country: USA
Norwich
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 32 8 5 13 0.406 0.1492 0.1543 0.4287 0.4433
2024-25 — NAHL 48 7 13 20 0.417 0.1531 0.1503 0.4398 0.4317
2025-26 — NAHL 32 6 3 9 0.281 0.1033 0.0963 0.2968 0.2767
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38299
Forward overall
#2389
Forward born in 2005
#4010
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Norwich Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ethan Begg
0.00
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Alec Brandrup
0.54
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Cole Fagan
0.27
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Phil Sbrocchi
0.43
actual FR PPG at Norwich

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Carlyle
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Forrest
Concordia · 2023-24
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Knowlton
Trinity · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.