IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grayson Gerhard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-07 Country: USA
Endicott
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 38 4 5 9 0.237 0.0870 0.0900 0.2503 0.2589
2024-25 — NAHL 57 15 22 37 0.649 0.2385 0.2342 0.6860 0.6737
2025-26 — NAHL 57 16 38 54 0.947 0.3481 0.3247 1.0013 0.9341
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18603
Forward overall
#987
Forward born in 2005
#1120
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

Endicott Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sebastian Speck
0.93
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Tommy Besinger
1.14
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Zach Mazur
1.22
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Ricky Carballo
0.86
actual FR PPG at Endicott

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.