IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Whisenand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-04 Country: USA
Aurora
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 46 4 5 9 0.196 0.0719 0.0749 0.2066 0.2153
2024-25 — NAHL 46 8 8 16 0.348 0.1278 0.1265 0.3671 0.3633
2025-26 Chippewa Steel NAHL 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.0919 0.0864 0.2639 0.2482
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24960
Forward overall
#1415
Forward born in 2005
#1981
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Aurora Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Carson Riddle
0.30
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Simon Diaz
0.63
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Drew Doyon
0.63
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Anthony Tzveyn
0.67
actual FR PPG at Aurora

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Nelson
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Araujo
Nazareth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Loza
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.