← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Riggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-08 Country: USA
Rivier
MASCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northeast Generals NA3HL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.0628 0.0657 1.0555 1.1183
2024-25 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 43 7 13 20 0.465 0.0608 0.0601 0.1579 0.1562
2025-26 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 44 13 31 44 1.000 0.1308 0.1229 0.3394 0.3189
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4349
Defenseman overall
#1113
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Rivier Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.64
actual FR PPG at Rivier
0.42
actual FR PPG at Rivier
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.