← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zander Lipsett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-07 Country: USA
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Austin Bruins NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Austin Bruins NAHL 46 7 3 10 0.217 0.0799 0.0815 0.2298 0.2343
2025-26 Austin Bruins NAHL 59 17 21 38 0.644 0.2366 0.2296 0.6807 0.6604
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Air Force D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30677
Forward overall
#1790
Forward born in 2005
#2781
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force
NAHL 2016-17
0.30
actual FR PPG at Air Force
BCHL 2018-19
0.14
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2010-11
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2018-19
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.