IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Hirsch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-07 Country: USA
Williams
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 26 6 1 7 0.269 0.0533 0.0533 0.1226 0.1226
2023-24 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 9 5 14 0.518 0.1027 0.1027 0.2362 0.2362
2024-25 Northeast Generals NAHL 58 13 17 30 0.517 0.1900 0.1858 0.5459 0.5338
2025-26 Northeast Generals NAHL 41 15 14 29 0.707 0.2599 0.2414 0.7466 0.6933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24080
Forward overall
#1357
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

Williams Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jackson Krill
1.00
actual FR PPG at Williams
Craig Kitto
0.85
actual FR PPG at Williams
Bryden McGhee
0.55
actual FR PPG at Williams
Justin Troiani
0.58
actual FR PPG at Williams

D2/3 Comparables

Marc Biggs
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.