← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Jarmain Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-10 Country: USA
Bowdoin
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 The Hill School NE-Prep 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.0792 0.0792 0.1822 0.1822
2022-23 The Hill School NE-Prep 23 2 0 2 0.087 0.0172 0.0172 0.0396 0.0396
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 49 11 8 19 0.388 0.1581 0.1647 0.3117 0.3248
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 57 8 12 20 0.351 0.1289 0.1282 0.3704 0.3684
2025-26 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 59 37 26 63 1.068 0.3923 0.3709 1.1271 1.0657
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16645
Forward overall
#869
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

Bowdoin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.76
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
0.84
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
0.71
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
0.71
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.