← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Csabi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-17 Country: Czechia
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 HC Energie Karlovy Vary U20 USHL-Style-Czech 17 1 5 6 0.353 0.1090 0.1175 0.3769 0.4061
2022-23 HC Energie Karlovy Vary U20 USHL-Style-Czech 16 10 8 18 1.125 0.3474 0.3571 1.2015 1.2349
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 54 20 19 39 0.722 0.2783 0.2829 1.0510 1.0683
2024-25 HC Vitkovice U20 USHL-Style-Czech 13 4 8 12 0.923 0.2851 0.2684 0.9859 0.9282
2025-26 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 53 22 27 49 0.924 0.3562 0.3311 1.3454 1.2504
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14969
Forward overall
#761
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2012-13
0.42
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
NAHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
WHL 2024-25
0.30
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.