IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Martin-Gaudreault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-13 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 37 10 11 21 0.568 0.1231 0.1280 0.4348 0.4521
2024-25 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 54 4 9 13 0.241 0.0884 0.0895 0.2544 0.2574
2025-26 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 26 40 66 1.138 0.4181 0.4025 1.2026 1.1578
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18365
Forward overall
#972
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jeremiah Luedtke
BCHL 2014-15
0.40
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Marcus Mitchell
BCHL 2018-19
0.13
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Zack Nazzarett
NAHL 2020-21
0.58
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Samuel Boisvert
BCHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.