IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Hutchen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-19 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 23 4 8 12 0.522 0.1917 0.2085 0.5507 0.5989
2025-26 Chippewa Steel NAHL 10 4 1 5 0.500 0.1837 0.1907 0.5278 0.5480
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27597
Forward overall
#914
Forward born in 2007
#2351
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jacob Fletcher
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Patrick Schmiedlin
NAHL 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Shane LaVelle
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Ryan Finnegan
BCHL 2015-16
0.69
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Artyom Mateychenko
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fletcher Anderson
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.