IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Piccirillo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-07 Country: USA
Curry
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 41 2 11 13 0.317 0.1293 0.1325 0.2549 0.2613
2024-25 Elmira Aviators NAHL 47 1 7 8 0.170 0.0625 0.0611 0.1796 0.1756
2025-26 Elmira Aviators NAHL 57 0 9 9 0.158 0.0580 0.0539 0.1667 0.1548
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17974
Defenseman overall
#3230
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Curry Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Phil Kiss
0.33
actual FR PPG at Curry
Kalle Sundell
0.38
actual FR PPG at Curry
Jacob Hutt
0.28
actual FR PPG at Curry
Jonathan Miller
0.40
actual FR PPG at Curry

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Dowd
Salem State · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Stewart
Canton · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Tanskanen
New England College · 2024-25
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.