← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakub Galnor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-17 Country: Czechia
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Utica
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 HC Energie Karlovy Vary U20 USHL-Style-Czech 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0618 0.0679 0.2136 0.2346
2023-24 HC Energie Karlovy Vary U20 USHL-Style-Czech 37 17 12 29 0.784 0.2420 0.2559 0.8371 0.8852
2024-25 Vernon Vipers BCHL 24 4 4 8 0.333 0.1284 0.1331 0.4851 0.5029
2025-26 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 56 19 32 51 0.911 0.3346 0.3362 0.9612 0.9657
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25686
Forward overall
#1258
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Utica Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

1.46
actual FR PPG at Utica
0.81
actual FR PPG at Utica
1.00
actual FR PPG at Utica
0.68
actual FR PPG at Utica

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2022-23
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.